Straits will apply equally to the present case. It seems to me that the Banishment Ordinance has been worked out as far as possible.
As to Blake's argument about the treaties with China, we are pledged to expel the inhabitants. The bill introduces a new principle, as hitherto only persons of certain natures have been banished.
However, as you state in your telegram of 11th March, the bill has not been proceeded with. I need not say that the matter is of great concern to the country.
DRAFT.
MINUTE.
Mr. Antrobus. Mr. Cox. Mr. Lucas. Mr. Graham. Sir M. Ommanney. The Duke of Marlborough. Mr. Lyttelton.
The fact is that the native inhabitants, except those who are exempted, are subject to the provisions of the Banishment Ordinance.
Are the arguments against Blake's views to be considered?
¿
Straits
will apply equally,
to me to the present
for it seems
case.
As to the Banistent.
to have that by
panked out posabled
ord ce
Seem
Blake
the
tenus
사
the Cauruti
with China. this we
але
pledged wilt to expel
the ühabitants.
Doomed Is
& Further
the bill introduces at
Entela
new principle, as
Hitherto arly persons no
The Glmy
natures of ben famished a
Carol
mean
bare
banis lument enla
However as
State in
You Your telegram
11. Mar
that the lill has not been
their proceeded with I need not say
that the mural"
So tack to
country.
new
their
Bati
ik
mm
the whatind
kunsay out
fauisher
More about it!
>>
DRAFT.
they
for
have
would I be sent.com
thir
Wo
humes
683
I would
place togo
Ӣ
The present law girao obamüse pas aus
paver
who are
MINUTE.
Д
Mr.
Mr.
A
Mr. Antrobus.
Mr. Cox.
Mr. Lucas.
Mr. Graham.
Sir M. Ommanney.
The Duke of Marlborough
Mr. Lyttelton.
the
fuct with abitants
nativo
those who are whatdam
the
Samme
Kb. exeppted
right.
purifions of Banishempat ordinances
a
क्ष
the color.
nations of
haft an
Consult to
سا
Enti there
to suit will be gets
Are
of Blakes
arguments against
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.